USPTO serial 77011597
MOTHER NATURE'S TAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4036672Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2011
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, HOWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOTHER NATURE'S TAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Hardison
Maria Hardison Tassan & Hardison4143 27th Street N.Arlington, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Tanning salons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2010 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |