USPTO serial 77011865
VAULTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VAULTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baton Rouge, LA
BATON ROUGE, LA
Auto Finance Technologies, L.L.C.
Baton Rouge, LA
Auto Finance Technologies, L.L.C.
Baton Rouge, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Avsec
Andrew J. Avsec Brinks Hofer Gilson & LioneP. O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an on-line computer database featuring trade information in the field of the automobile dealer market, namely loan documentation, funding packages, retail installment contracts, bills of sale, credit applications, book-out sheets, vehicle service contracts, vehicle title application/lien recordation forms, insurance agreements, and guaranteed asset protection contracts for use by automobile dealers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AppOne Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by APPONE SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Auto Finance Technologies, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Auto Finance Technologies, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VAULTONE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |