Drawing for CZAR'S GOLD

USPTO serial 77012145

CZAR'S GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4230211Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2012
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CZAR'S GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James H. Walters

Marie-Anne Mastrovito Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Vodka produced, bottled and imported from outside of the United States onlySECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2019C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 6, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2018C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 20, 2018ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
Sep 14, 2012REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2012CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 9, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 31, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 31, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 7, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 5, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 11, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 5, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 16, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 29, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 29, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 26, 2007OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance