USPTO serial 77012383
LATINA STREET GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LATINA STREET GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B WAGNER
10011 SE DIVISIONSTE 310PORTLAND, OR 97266Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Jackets; Jerseys; T-shirts; Tank tops; Hats; Pullovers; Shorts; Sweat shirts; Belts; Shoes; Underwear; Baseball caps; Socks; Visors; Headbands; Overalls; Slippers; Pajamas; Pants; Suspenders; Bikinis; Boots; Swim wear; Beanies; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts | PARTIALLY PAID | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |