USPTO serial 77012761
ITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Woodland Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter K. Hahn
PETER K HAHN LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP600 W BROADWAY STE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3372UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Motor oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Hydraulic and mechanical lifting jacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand operated lifting jacks; hand tools, namely, tire repair tools, tire removal tools, tire installation tools, hub cap removal tools, wheel jack removal tools, wheel weight removal tools, wheel weight installation tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Batteries for vehicles, tire pressure sensors and gauges; vehicle wheel alignment machines; land vehicle tire balancing machines; combination vehicle tire changer and tire balancing machines for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ITR USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ITR USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ITA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |