Drawing for SOVEREIGN SELECT ENERGYLOCK

USPTO serial 77012807

SOVEREIGN SELECT ENERGYLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOVEREIGN SELECT ENERGYLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly M. Ford

HOLLY M FORD BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEYP.O. BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business marketing in the fields of building and constructionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 3, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance