USPTO serial 77012975
MAESTRO SYSTEM SOFTWARE BY MED-EL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3664024Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 2009
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAESTRO SYSTEM SOFTWARE BY MED-EL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
6020 Innsbruck, AT
Other trademarks owned by Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
6020 Innsbruck, AT
Other trademarks owned by Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
6020 Innsbruck, AT
Other trademarks owned by Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR PROGRAMMING SPEECH PROCESSORS, NAMELY, COCHLEA-IMPLANTS AND IMPLANT SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE FOR IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS AND FIELD-TELEMETRIC MEASUREMENTS IN THE FIELD OF IMPLANT AND IMPLANT ELECTRODE FUNCTIONS KNOWN AS IFT IMPEDANCE AND FIELD TELEMETRY; SOFTWARE FOR IMPLANT AND STIMULATION PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION ALSO KNOWN AS TELEMETRY; SOFTWARE FOR DETERMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION ON PHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS OF THE STIMULATED HEARING NERVES ALSO KNOWN AS HEARING NERVE-RESPONSE-TELEMETRY OR ART | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MAESTRO SYSTEM SOFTWARE BY MED-EL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |