USPTO serial 77013017
TREND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TREND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joi A. White
Joi A. White CARR & FERRELL LLP120 CONSTITUTION DRIVEMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer security software; computer antivirus software; malicious code and malicious content screening software; firewall software; software for monitoring, filtering and modifying messages, files, programs and data retrieved or received from computer and communication networks; computer software for use in scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; computer software for use in repairing damage from viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; computer software for network security and network management; computer software for securing wireless computer networks; anti-spam, anti-fraud, and anti-phishing computer software; computer software for enforcing content policies for electronic mail, instant messaging, and web usage; computer utility software; electronic software updates, namely, downloadable computer software and associated data files for updating computer software in the fields of computer and network security, provided via computer and communication networks; computer hardware, not including ethernet cards or ethernet hubs; computer network security appliances not including ethernet cards or ethernet hubs, namely computer hardware preinstalled with security software, in Class 9 | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | data sheets, quick start guides, installation instructions, troubleshooting guides, technical reference manuals, pamphlets, books, booklets, training manuals, instructional manuals, all in the fields of computers, computer hardware, computer software, information technology, computer programs, computer security, and information security | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic mail management services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, online scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; computer virus protection services; providing online computer databases in the fields of computer software, computer and data security and computer system management; providing information relating to computer software, computer and data security and computer system management via the Internet and other computer and communications networks; provision of information relating to viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices via the Internet and other computer and communications networks; technical consultation in the field of computers, computer systems, computer software, and computer and communication networks; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone and electronic mail; computer programming for others; filtering electronic mail for others; provision of electronic mail security services for others, namely blocking, rejecting or quarantining spam and other unwanted messages, and cleaning messages of viruses, trojans, and malware; providing reputation services, namely information and databases regarding the association of sender identity information with network abuse, including the sending of spam electronic mail | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | scanning and monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; providing information in the fields of global computer network and local area network security, preventing computer viruses, computer hardware and software applications in security; providing enterprise security threat management systems, namely, monitoring and tracking of security vulnerabilities and problems in computers, computer data, software products and computer networks; computer security services, namely, intrusion detection services, intrusion prevention services, vulnerability assessment services; computer security services, namely services in the nature of detecting and removing computer viruses worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs and threats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trend Micro Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Trend Micro Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TREND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |