USPTO serial 77013054
CANDELIERART.COM BY STEFAN DAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANDELIERART.COM BY STEFAN DAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carbondale, CO
Carbondale, CO
Carbondale, CO
Carbondale, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric lighting fixtures; electric lighting fixtures, namely, sconces; lighting fixtures; sconce lighting fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dag, Stefan A.
- Other trademarks owned by Dag, Stefan A.
- Other trademarks owned by Anwyl-Davies, Eva Alexandra
- Other trademarks owned by Anwyl-Davies, Eva Alexandra
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named CANDELIERART.COM BY STEFAN DAG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2009 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |