Drawing for DEVICE DOCTOR

USPTO serial 77013168

DEVICE DOCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEVICE DOCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Fletcher

Michael Fletcher Carlton Fields P.A.P.O. Box 3239Tampa, FL 33601-3239UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for delivering remote technical assistance to mobile phones and other wireless devices, namely, cell phones, PDAs, and portable media storage/players for audio and videoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 6, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 28, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance