USPTO serial 77013432
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN A. KLEIMAN
KATHLEEN A KLEIMAN SIMMONS PERRINE ALBRIGHT & ELLWOOD PLC115 3RD ST SE STE 1200CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52401-1266UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Equipment used in providing communications services, namely broadband communication services; hardware and software for use in communications networks, namely, internet protocol and telecommunications network transmitters, receivers, converters, and routers which allow the user to send voice, data, pictures, music and video over wireless broadband networks | ACTIVE | Apr 11, 2005 |
| 038 | Provide communications services, namely wireless broadband network services | ACTIVE | Apr 11, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |