USPTO serial 77013546
TECHNETIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNETIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Gray
Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | The bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from an Internet website specialising in components used in broadband networks, passive networks and customer installations connected to such networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Storage and packaging of components for use in broadband networks, passive networks and customer installations connected to such networks; delivery by truck and air of components used in broadband networks, passive networks and customer installations connected to such networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Technetix Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Technetix Group Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named TECHNETIX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |