USPTO serial 77013585
EVONIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 15, 2008
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EVONIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Essen, DE
Dortmund, DE
Dortmund, DE
Dortmund, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott D. Woldow
Scott D. Woldow Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, Suite 400Washington, DC 20007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for environmental technology, namely, machines for removing [, shredding and compressing of garbage and ] waste [, briquetting machines, spiral presses, press and dosage machines, machines for pressing and storing of garbage and waste and for weighing and accounting delivered portions of garbage and waste; Machines for waste disposal; Machines for power engineering, namely, deflection rollers and guide wheels ] ; Machines for chemical processing engineering, namely, [ disintegrators, dissolving machines, ] extracting machines, [ granulating machines, grinding mills, kneading machines, ] separating machines [, sintering machines, sorting machines ] for chemical processing [, and semiconductor wafer processing engineering equipment and machines; Continuous-flow machines, namely, continuous casting machines, continuous metal machines, continuous scouring and bleaching machines; Mining machines, namely, centrifugal concentrators, gravity concentrators, shaking tables, drills and truck mills; Hoisting machinery and conveyers; Construction equipment, namely, power sweepers, drilling machines, concrete construction machines, tire chains and over the tire track systems for skid steer loaders; Transport machines equipment, namely, power-operated lift used to transport and place portable storage containers; Casting machines; Machine tools, namely, broaches, chasers, milling cutters, electro-chemical discharge machine tools for metalworking, gear cutters, grinding tools for grinding machines, machine tools for removing waste material, machine tools, namely, rotary dies for cutting boxes for the packaging industry, machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, metal clamps used for holding piece parts on machine tool tables, metalworking machine tools, thread milling cutters, tool bits and tool grinding machines; Motors and engines not for land vehicles; Machine coupling and transmission components not for land vehicles, namely, driving belts, flexible shaft couplings, shaft couplings for machines, bearings for transmission shafts, belts for transmission shafts, belts for transmissions, power transmissions belts and transmission gears; Agricultural implements other than hand-operated, namely, rotary cutters, hay spears, hay lifters, seed drills, cultivators, harvestors, disk harrowers, seeders, combines, threshers, tillers, windrowers, agriculture seed planting machines, balers for agriculture or industrial use, reapers, plows, tractor towed harrows, mowers, tractor towed hay rakes, hay balers, tractor towed broadcast seeders, tractor towed manure spreaders, tractor towed fertilizer distributors, tractor towed huskers, and tractor towed rollers; Catalytic converters for motors and engines ] ; Machines and machine parts for generating gas, namely, [ gas compressors, non-electric gas liquefiers, ] gas splitters [, and electric valves and pumps; Machines and parts therefor for using alternative energy sources to generate and distribute energy, in the nature of heat, steam and electricity, namely, steam engines, steam marine engines, steam pressure variation engines, steam turbines, solar powered electricity generators, wind powered electricity generators, fuel cell electrical power generators, photovoltaic energy generating systems; Centrifugal, dust, oil, cyclone and vibrator screen separators; Steam condensers as parts of machines; and parts for the aforementioned goods ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG
- Other trademarks owned by LG Verwaltungs, GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LG Verwaltungs, GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LG Verwaltungs, GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named EVONIK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 28, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |