Drawing for BACCARAT 21

USPTO serial 77013676

BACCARAT 21

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACCARAT 21?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; GAMING MACHINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR GAMING MACHINESACTIVE—
016PROCEDURE MANUALS FOR PLAYING CASINO GAMESACTIVE—
028EQUIPMENT FOR PLAYING CASINO GAMES, NAMELY, LAYOUT CLOTHS; CASINO CARD GAMES; AND PLAYER ADVICE CARDS FOR PLAYING CASINO GAMESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF CASINO GAMES; PROVIDING ON-LINE CASINO GAMES AND GAMES OF CHANCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 6, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 6, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 6, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 1, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 1, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 6, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 6, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance