USPTO serial 77013693
EVONIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2008
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EVONIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dortmund, DE
Essen, DE
Dortmund, DE
Dortmund, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott D. Woldow
Scott D. Woldow Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, Suite 400Washington, DC 20007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological research and design services; Industrial analysis and research services in the fields of science and technology; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Technical consultancy in relation to development of technologies and technical components for food; technical consultancy in relation to development and implementation of technologies and technical components for food and beverage processing and producing; technical consultancy in relation to technical research in the field of food and beverages; technical consultancy in relation to processes for leaching and detoxification; technical consultancy in relation to silicon compounds; technical consultancy in relation to catalysts; technical consultancy in relation to electronics; technical consultancy in relation to rubbers and polymers; technical consultancy in relation to leaching and detoxification of cyanide; [ technical consultancy in relation to the field of environmental science, engineering services and design for others in the field of environmental engineering, designing and testing of new environmentally friendly products for others; ] technical consultancy in relation to research services relating to foods and dietary supplements; [ technical consultancy in relation to how to make products and processes environmentally sound; Providing of technical surveys; Material testing; Performing chemical and physical analysis of waste and residue from waste incineration plants, power plants or water treatment plants; Architectural services;] Services of chemists [ ; Engineering services; Medical, bacteriological or chemical laboratories; Services of physicists; and computer programming for data processing; Structural and civil engineering; water engineering; timber engineering ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LG Verwaltungs, GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Evonik Industries AG
- Other trademarks owned by LG Verwaltungs, GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LG Verwaltungs, GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EVONIK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |