Drawing for HOSPITALITY CONSTRUCTION EXPO

USPTO serial 77014890

HOSPITALITY CONSTRUCTION EXPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HOSPITALITY CONSTRUCTION EXPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Henry M. Quillian III

Henry M. Quillian III Fellows LaBriola LLP225 Peachtree Street NESuite 2300Atlanta, GA 30303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Arranging and conducting trade shows in the field of construction, namely, trade shows featuring specialized materials, products, and services for construction, architectural and functional aspects of hospitality design, building and facilities managementABANDONEDJun 30, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 4, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 4, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 4, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 25, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 27, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance