USPTO serial 77014943
SUPERRESOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERRESOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Karlsbad, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W Becker
ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 STATE HWY 333 STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059-7382UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical equipment for communications and for digital and audiovisual signal transmission, namely, wireless phones, moderns, and radio telephones, computers and parts therefor; electrical apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, DVD- players, DVD-recorders, DVD-drives, DVD-writers, CD-players, CD-recorders, CD-drives, CD-writers, HD-DVD-players, HD-DVD-recorders, HD-DVD-drives, HD-DVD-writers, optical disc-players, optical disc-recorders, optical disc-drives, optical disc-writers, data audio tape-players, data audio tape-recorders, data audio tape-drives, data audio tape-writers, video-tape-players and video-tape-recorders; computers and data processing equipment, parts and accessories therefor, namely, computers, data processors, computer printers, graphic screens, keyboards; electronic storage units, namely, removable flush storage in the nature of memory cards and USB sticks, hard disks, optical storage discs; electronic drawing implements, namely, electronic pens and graphic tablets; computer mice, computer keyboards, trackballs, joysticks, gamepads, optical scanners, graphic cards, computer graphic software; external and internal drives, namely, CD drives, CD-R drives, CD-RW drives, DVD drives, optical disc drives; exchangeable disc drives, namely, removable hard disks, data audio tape drives; electrical cables, wires, conductors and connection fittings therefor; blank machine-readable data carriers, namely, magnetic tapes, data audio tapes, magnetic tape cassettes, magnetic storage disks, compact floppy disks, hard disks, exchangeable hard disks, optical storage disks, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, DVDs, DVD-Rs, DVD-RWs, DVD+RWs, DVD-ROMs, DVD-audios, DVD-videos, mini-DVDs, HD-DVDs, optical discs; blank machine-readable data carriers, namely, storage disks with multiple overwrite and erase facility in the nature of photo-CDs, audio-CDs, super-audio CDs, video-CDs, super video CDs and extended video CDs; mechanical data carriers containing programs for the copying, erasing, managing, compressing, de-compressing and repairing of data and data files; computer programs for reading, writing and erasing data carriers with read and write facility, namely, compact floppy disks, magnetic floppy disks and hard disks with overwrite facility with user interfaces therefor; computer programs for activating CD recorders for formatting mechanical data carriers for the subsequent writing of data and data files; software for the computer-aided translation of texts; software for storing, managing, retrieving and checking translations and translation memories; software for storing, managing, retrieving and checking terminology entries and digital dictionaries; software for networking, interaction and data exchange between several computers; data memories, namely, hard disks, optical discs, removable flash storage memory cards and USB sticks, and software for recording, playback, authoring, encoding, decoding, transcoding, transrating, streaming, copying, erasing, reading, writing, formatting, backup and recovering data; computer software for use in providing translations; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; downloadable electronic dictionaries; computer software featuring a dictionary | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |