USPTO serial 77014976
DESIGNED IN CALIFORNIA FOR THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESIGNED IN CALIFORNIA FOR THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carmel Valley, CA
Carmel Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pasquale A. Razzano
PASQUALE A RAZZANO FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Skirts, sweaters, vests, overcoats, hats, loungewear, cruise wear, tee-shirts, underpants, foundations, undergarments, pajamas, jackets, suits, dressing gowns, hosiery, trousers, and robes; ceremonial clothing, namely, kilts, military uniforms and jackets; and belts, braces and cummerbunds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |