Drawing for BEET THE VANDEL BUSTER

USPTO serial 77015107

BEET THE VANDEL BUSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEET THE VANDEL BUSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric P. Bergner, Esq.

ERIC P BERGNER ESQ MOSES & SINGER LLPTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-1299

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely baseball hats, baseball shirts, cloth bibs, booties, costumes for use in role playing, children's bibs not made of paper; children's wear, namely dresses; earbands, footwear, gloves, gowns, hats, headwear, infants' cloth and plastic bibs; infants' wear, namely jackets, jerseys, knit shirts, mittens, neckties, nightshirts; one piece garments for infants and toddlers, pajamas, pants, playsuits, rugby shirts, running shorts, scarves, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, sleepwear, slippers, socks, sports jerseys, sports shirts; sportswear, namely, sun visors, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweatbands, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatshirts; tops, t-shirts, vests, undergarments, uniforms, wind jackets, wind vests and wristbandsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance