Drawing for DDI HEAT EXCHANGER

USPTO serial 77015121

DDI HEAT EXCHANGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DDI HEAT EXCHANGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Heat exchangers being parts of machinesACTIVEJan 1, 1990
011Heat exchangers; Heat exchangers not being parts of machinesACTIVEJan 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 11, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 17, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 26, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 2, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 28, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 28, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 12, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance