USPTO serial 77015236
LA DESIGNS A FASHION UMBRELLA COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA DESIGNS A FASHION UMBRELLA COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina Kay
CATHERINE A SHULTZ KINNEY & LANGE PATHE KINNEY & LANGE BUILDING312 SOUTH THIRD STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Aprons; ascots; babies' pants; bandanas and neckerchiefs; bath robes; bath sandals; bath slippers; bathing caps; bathing suits and bathing trunks; beach shoes; belts; money belts; berets; cloth bibs; ski bibs, bib overalls; boas; bodices; boots; boots for sports; boots for skiing; braces and suspenders for clothing; brassieres; breeches; camisoles; caps; caps for shower; chasubles; chemisettes; clothing, namely, shirts, jeans, jackets, blazers, woven shirts, t-shirts, knit shirts, pants, shorts, sweatshirts, overalls, blouses, skirts, dresses, vests, sweaters, coats; sportswear, namely, tennis and golf dresses, bathing suits, beach and swimming cover-ups, ponchos, tank tops, warm-up suits, jogging suits and sweat suits, sports jackets and skirts, cyclists' jerseys; collars for clothing; corselets; corsets as underclothing; detachable collars; underpants; dressing gowns; ear muffs; esparto shoes or sandals; fishing vests; football boots; football shoes; muffs for shoes; footwear; frocks; fur stoles; galoshes; ankle garters; garter belts; girdles; gloves; galoshes; dressing gowns; gymnastic shoes; half-boots; hats; headbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |