Drawing for HAMMER-TITE THE ULTIMATE PROJECT GLUE

USPTO serial 77015292

HAMMER-TITE THE ULTIMATE PROJECT GLUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAMMER-TITE THE ULTIMATE PROJECT GLUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Wilson

ROBERT D WILSON ROBERT D WILSON CO LPA16716 CHILLICOTHE RD STE 100CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44023-4529UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Adhesive materials for the building industry and tiles; Adhesives for use in the manufacture of furniture; Construction industry adhesivesACTIVEOct 2, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 13, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 10, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 23, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance