Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77015374?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77015374. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CLUTCH N BURN?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77015374, the listed owner(s) include: Black, Mark A., Black, Mark A..

What is USPTO serial number 77015374?

Serial number 77015374 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CLUTCH N BURN. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover CLUTCH N BURN?

The public record lists International Classes: 200. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77015374

CLUTCH N BURN

Q: What is the current status of CLUTCH N BURN?

CLUTCH N BURN (77015374) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Oct 6, 2006
Status date: Mar 2, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLUTCH N BURN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Black, Mark A.
Virginia Beach, VA
Other trademarks owned by Black, Mark A.
Black, Mark A.
Virginia Beach, VA
Other trademarks owned by Black, Mark A.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shawn R Farmer

Shawn Farmer Muskin & Cusick LLC100 W. Main StSuite 205Lansdale, PA 19446

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
200	Collective Membership Mark INDICATING MEMBERSHIP IN A MOTORCYCLE CLUB	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 19, 2009	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Mar 2, 2009	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2009	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2008	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Mar 31, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Mar 28, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Mar 17, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 17, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 17, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jan 31, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jan 31, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 31, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 30, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 29, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Sep 13, 2007	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Sep 11, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Sep 8, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 29, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 29, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Mar 5, 2007	GPRA	PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 5, 2007	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 23, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 13, 2006	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	—
Oct 12, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—