USPTO serial 77015495
DEFENDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2011
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DEFENDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NIAGARA O THE LAKE, CA
Niagara Falls, CA
Niagara Falls, CA
Niagara Falls, CA
ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric and electronic audio-video surveillance systems both wired and wireless, comprised of video cameras and video monitors for closed circuit television; security video cameras, cathode ray and LCD video monitors for security purposes; audio baby monitors; audio-video baby monitors; camera cases, electric and electronic wire and cable, plug and insulated electrical connectors, structural parts for cameras, namely, lenses, Internet Protocol cameras, fake or imitation or dummy cameras for security purposes, electric or luminous warning signs, intercommunication systems in the nature of video intercoms, video monitors for use in automobiles, audio voice recorders, counter surveillance equipment, namely, wireless signal detectors, phone bug detectors and infrared emission detectors for the detections of surveillance equipment, computer software for viewing, streaming, and recording video security feeds over the Internet for use with closed circuit televisions, electronic apparatus, namely, motion detectors, portable infrared emitting LED devices that aid security cameras in monitoring property at night, light emitting products, namely, light emitting diodes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Circus World Displays Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Circus World Displays Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Circus World Displays Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BODDHIK INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DEFENDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |