Drawing for SOFTAIL ROCKER

USPTO serial 77015870

SOFTAIL ROCKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOFTAIL ROCKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Ziegler

JENNIFER K ZIEGLER H-D MICHIGAN INC315 W HURON ST STE 400ANN ARBOR, MI 48103-3372UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motorcycles and structural parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 25, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 17, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 16, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 5, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 13, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 9, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 9, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 7, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 27, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance