Drawing for UPS ORDER RESCUE

USPTO serial 77015897

UPS ORDER RESCUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UPS ORDER RESCUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Schaetzel

Stephen M. Schaetzel KING & SPALDING LLP1180 PEACHTREE STREETATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Delivery of goods by air, rail, boat and motor vehicle; Freight transportation by air, rail, boat and motor vehicle; Global transportation of freight for others by all available means; Supply chain, logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of documents, packages, raw materials, and other freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck; Transportation and delivery services, namely, same day shipment services; Transportation of passengers and/or goods by air, rail, boat and motor vehicleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 26, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance