USPTO serial 77015960
OPTISOLAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTISOLAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Stoll
DAVID E STOLL FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP235 MONTGOMERY ST FL 17SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-3104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for converting electronic radiation to electrical energy, namely, photovoltaic roofing members and solar-thermal hybrid modules; electronic sensors for measuring solar radiation and electronic controls for solar collectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | solar collectors; solar heat collection panels; solar light fixtures, namely, indoor and outdoor solar powered lighting units and fixtures; components for solar collector systems, namely, tanks, receivers, accumulators, heat exchangers, strainers, manifolds, and collectors; manual controls of solar collectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | roofing, not of metal, incorporating solar cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | managerial planning of and business consultation on the utilization of solar equipment and solar systems, solar thermal equipment and systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer programming for others of machines for solar installations, solar thermal installations, photovoltaic installations, photovoltaic modules and renewable energy installations; computer programming for others in the field of controlling, regulation and monitoring of solar-thermal and photovoltaic solar equipment; computer consulting in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for solar installations, solar thermal installations, photovoltaic installations, photovoltaic modules and renewable energy installations; evaluating roofing for photovoltaic roofing product installation and requirements compliance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gen 3 Solar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTISOLAR INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTISOLAR INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTISOLAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPTISOLAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |