USPTO serial 77016111
THE PENINSULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE PENINSULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
ANTHONY V LUPO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, and prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; chocolate powder, chocolate toppings, chocolate syrup, chocolate paste and chocolate fondue; sugar; flour and processed cereals; candy bars; candy coated popcorn; candy containing cocoa; gummy candies; starch based candies; sugarless candies; bread; pastries; ice cream; flavored ices; ice; frozen confections; freezable liquid for use in making flavored ices and frozen confections; honey; treacle; cereal, corn, rice and wheat based snack foods; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bakery desserts, dessert puddings, dessert mousse, and dessert soufflés; Chinese desserts, namely, almond cookies, cookies in the shape of bow ties, cakes for the Chinese New Year, dessert cakes containing chop suey, candied walnuts, Peking dust dessert, namely, whipped cream dessert containing chestnuts and rice pudding; condiments, namely, pimento used as a condiment, soybean paste, mayonnaise, mustard, ketchup, horse radish paste, wasabi paste; spices; baking powder; vinegar; salt; pepper for use as a spice; non-alcoholic chocolate-based food beverages not being dairy or vegetable based; cocoa-based beverages with milk; coffee-based beverages containing milk; prepared coffee and coffee based beverages; buns; Wine in class custard; flavoring syrup, and flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes; frozen yogurt; meat gravies; confectionery in the nature of fruit jellies; macaroni; meat pies; muesli; noodles; oatmeal; pancakes; pasta; pies; pizza; popcorn; quiche; sandwiches; seasonings; spaghetti; spring rolls; sushi; tacos; tarts; tortillas; pasta, namely, vermicelli; waffles; flavorings for beverages; tea-based beverages with fruit flavorings; non-medicinal herbal infusions; puddings; relish; sago; tomato sauce; soy sauce; tapioca; iced tea; processed grains, namely, oat flakes; peanut confectionery, namely, peanut brittle and peanut butter confectionery chips; seafood sauce; moon cakes; ready-made entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peninsula International (USA) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Peninsula International (USA) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE PENINSULA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |