USPTO serial 77016389
PAYME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAYME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
neward, DE
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Bill payment services; Collecting license fees on behalf of independent writers and publishers and making payments to the copyright owners of the music; Electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; Electronic processing of insurance claims and payment data; Equipment maintenance claims payment service for business; Fiduciary tax payment processing services; Making payments on pre-paid long distance calling cards for recharging minutes; Money order payment guarantee services; Pre-paid purchase card services namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely processing electronic payments through pre-paid cards; Prepaid card services in the nature of making payment for adding airtime to prepaid or pay-as-you-go wireless services; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing multiple payment options by means of customer-operated electronic terminals available on-site in retail stores; Tax payment processing services; Wireless telephone payment services, namely, wireless mobile telephone rate plans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |