Drawing for BEAUTY LOGICS

USPTO serial 77016534

BEAUTY LOGICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEAUTY LOGICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
0033-in-1 hair conditioners; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body and beauty care preparations; Body creams; Body emulsions; Body mask cream; Body mask lotion; Body milks; Cleansing creams; Conditioners; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for eye lashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetics; Exfoliants for body, foot; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body lotions; Face and body milk; Face creams for cosmetic use; Gel for hair; Hair balsam; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color; Liquid soap used in foot bath; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body; Non-medicated foot cream; Toning lotion, for the face, body and handsPARTIALLY PAIDJul 12, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2007RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Feb 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance