USPTO serial 77017170
NATURA BEM ESTAR BEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURA BEM ESTAR BEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Itapecerica da Serra, BR
Itapecerica da Serra, Sao Paulo, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joi A. White
Joi A. White CARR & FERRELL LLP120 CONSTITUTION DRIVEMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; makeup; make-up powder; foundation makeup; body and face powder; eyebrow cosmetics; eyebrow shadow; eyebrow pencils; lipsticks; lip liner; eye liner; skin lotions; mascara; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic products for eyelashes; false eyelashes; preparations and adhesives for attaching false eyelashes; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; astringents for cosmetic purposes; lotion for toning and firming the skin; skin whitening cream; skin whitening preparations; sun tan lotion; sunscreen and sun-tanning preparations; decorative transfers and skin jewels for cosmetic purposes; hair pomades; permanent wave preparations; neutralizers for permanent hair waving solutions; nail polish and varnish; false nails; nail care preparations; hair spray and hair styling preparations; hair care preparations; hair waving lotions; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; make-up removing preparations; beauty masks; hair dyes; hair colorants; cotton sticks, puffs and swabs for cosmetic purposes; cream for the face; body milks; moisturizing milks; milks for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic creams; bath salts, not for medical purposes; beard dyes; hair bleach; hair color remover; cakes of toilet soaps; facial cleansers and toners; skin cleansers and toners; perfume; toilet water; lavender water; scented linen water; potpourris; scented wood for use as incense; eau de cologne; botanical extracts and concentrated perfume for personal use; antiperspirants; personal deodorants; fragrances and essential oils for personal use; jasmine oil for personal use; essential oils, namely mint essence; essential oils, namely almond oil and lavender; essential oils, namely lemon oil; oils for use in cleansing the skin; essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products; cosmetic oils; scented oils to produce aromas when heated; bath oil; soap; rose oil soap; almond toilet soap; sachets; depilatory wax; shaving preparations and shaving soap; chalk for make-up; pomades; after-shave lotions; shampoos; mouth washes, not for medical purposes; dentifrices; depilatories and depilatory creams; talcum powder for toilet use; coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated toiletries; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |