USPTO serial 77017171
C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lanoka Harbor, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A CATALINA
RICHARD A CATALINA CATALINA & ASSOCIATES2355 STATE HIGHWAY 33ROBBINSVILLE, NJ 08691UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, online services, information technology, internet website design, audio and video products and consumer electronics; providing a website for the uploading, sharing, viewing and posting of photographs, digital images, movies, videos, online journals, weblogs, and videoblogs and other multimedia entertainment materials over a global computer network; providing on-line publications in the nature of newsletters in the field of computers and entertainment; providing information in the field of computers and entertainment via the Internet | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |