CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IVPCARE OTN SPECIALTY PHARMACY

USPTO serial 77017231

IVPCARE OTN SPECIALTY PHARMACY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IVPCARE OTN SPECIALTY PHARMACY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Lynn Perry

E LYNN PERRY PERRY IP GROUP A LAW CORPORATION100 DRAKES LANDING RD STE 100GREENBRAE, CA 94904-3119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Administering pharmacy reimbursement programs and services; management services provided to pharmacies for controlling drug inventories, retail pharmacy services; distributorship services in the field of pharmaceutical productsACTIVE—
036Pharmacy benefit management servicesACTIVE—
044Providing health information via the internetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 12, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance