Drawing for KNOWLEDGE DIVERSITY RESPECT

USPTO serial 77017496

KNOWLEDGE DIVERSITY RESPECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KNOWLEDGE DIVERSITY RESPECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric P. Bergner, Esq.

ERIC P BERGNER ESQ MOSES & SINGER LLPTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-1299

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely baseball hats, baseball shirts, cloth bibs, booties, cheerleading costumes, children's bibs not made of paper, children's wear and infants' wear, namely, pants, shorts, shirts, sweaters, sweat shirts, vests, jackets, swim wear, head wear, socks, underwear, sleep wear, scarves, coats, skirts, dresses, tights, leotards, gloves, footwear; dresses, ear bands, footwear, gloves, gowns, hats, head wear, infants' cloth and plastic bibs, jackets, jerseys, knit shirts, mittens, neckties, nightshirts, one piece garments for infants and toddlers, pajamas, pants, play suits, rugby shirts, running shorts, scarves, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, sleep wear, slippers, socks, sports jerseys, sports shirts, sun visors, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweatbands, sweaters, sweat pants, sweatshirts, tops, t-shirts, vests, undergarments, uniforms, wind jackets, wind vests and wristbandsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance