USPTO serial 77017628
SDG <10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SDG <10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Dunn
THOMAS F DUNN MORSE, BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON PC1601 TRAPELO RD STE 205WALTHAM, MA 02451-7340UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Golfwear and casualwear, namely, golf shirts, golf sweaters, golf sweatshirts, golf polo shirts, golf vests and sweater vests, golf turtlenecks, club shirts, golf jackets, golf trousers, golf cleats, golf foul weather gear, golf windshirts, windvests and wind resistant jackets, golf rainsuits, golf waterproof jackets, golf fleece pullovers, golf caps and hats, golf visors, golf shoes, golf spikes and belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |