USPTO serial 77017727
SIMLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Sybert
Richard P. Sybert Gordon & Rees LLP101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, namely, non-medicated ointments in the nature of diaper rash ointment and ointments for the prevention and treatment of sunburn, shampoos, hair conditioners, soaps, body lotions, deodorants, and shaving preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Non-prescription medicines, namely, aspirin; and non medicated ointments, namely, anti-itch ointment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |