USPTO serial 77017791
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kirkland, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert L. Bello
HERBERT L BELLO LAW OFFICES OF HERBERT L BELLO1 HOLLIS STWELLESLEY, MA 02482-4631UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric juicers, electronic salt and pepper mills, electric coffee grinders | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Kitchen products, namely, stainless steel spoons; knives, fondue forks, scissors, pizza cutters, hand-operated slicers, cheese planes, vegetable and cheese slicers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Household utensils, namely, measuring spoons; kitchen products, namely, scales; cell phone holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Kitchen products, namely, fondue pots, electric food warmers, espresso coffee makers, electric tea and coffee pots, milk frothers, electric food steamers, electric roasters, butter warmers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household utensils, namely, salad tongs, turners, brushes for basting meats, whisks, pot and pan scrapers, graters, spatulas, strainers, sieves, trivets, cake and pie servers, pastry cutters, cookie cutters, mixing spoons, serving spoons, serving forks and beverage servers, kitchen products and gadgets, namely, nonelectric tea and coffee pots, cooking pots, frying pans, colanders for household use, nonelectric tea kettles, oven to table racks, salad bowls, bread boxes, cutting boards, paper towel dispensers, portable beverage dispensers, meal trays, rolling pins, bowls, jugs, canisters, salad spinners, bottles sold empty, nonelectric juicers, racks for spices, knives or dishes, utensil holders, towel holders, baskets for bread, fruit or picnics; barbecue products, namely, woks, grills, grill scrapers, grill spatulas, grill turners, grill tongs, grill brushes; fondue plates; and bakeware, namely, cookie sheets and cake molds; barware products, namely, corkscrews, funnels, cocktail shakers, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, ice buckets, goblets, liquid stoppers and pourers, pitchers, wine breathers, garbage cans; tabletop and serving accessories, namely, salt and pepper mills, cake and pie domes and holders, plates and center pieces, napkin holders; coffee and tea products, namely, manual coffee grinders, thermal carafes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |