Drawing for FLAVORS FROM HOME

USPTO serial 77017982

FLAVORS FROM HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLAVORS FROM HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Faye L. Tomlinson

FAYE L TOMLINSON CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PL1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Retail grocery products, namely, broths, beef, chicken, fish stocks, soups, chowder, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; retail grocery products, namely, eggs, fruit preserves, jams, dried fruits, frozen fruits, canned fruits, meat, poultry, soy-based food beverages used as a milk substitute, and dried, frozen, preserved, pickled and processed vegetables; retail grocery products, namely, nut-based food beverages, and prepackaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetablesACTIVE—
030Retail grocery products, namely, salad dressings, grain-based food beverages, prepackaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice, bakery products and saucesACTIVE—
031Retail grocery products, namely, fresh fruits and fresh vegetablesACTIVE—
032Retail grocery products, namely, fruit juices, fruit beverages and drinking waterACTIVE—
033Retail grocery products, namely, wineACTIVE—
035Developing promotional campaigns for businessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 13, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 4, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance