CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for UNIENDO FAMILIAS A TRAVES DE LA DISTANCIA

USPTO serial 77018039

UNIENDO FAMILIAS A TRAVES DE LA DISTANCIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIENDO FAMILIAS A TRAVES DE LA DISTANCIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara H. Loewenthal

Barbara H. Loewenthal GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and wholesale store services, catalog ordering services, retail and wholesale store services provided via toll free telephone number, and online ordering via global computer network in the field of electronics, household electronic appliances and products, video equipment, audio equipment, personal computers and other home and office products and furniture, telephones, phone answering devices; promoting the goods and services of others by placing and displaying advertisementsACTIVE—
036providing services, namely, financial services in the field of money lending, commercial lending, consumer lendingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance