Drawing for NATUREMATE

USPTO serial 77018154

NATUREMATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATUREMATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shemma Nazdjanova

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Nutritional additives for use in food manufactureACTIVE—
005Baby food; Dietary food supplements Biscuits, bread, bread rolls, cakes, cereal products, confectionary, crackers, noodles, fish souse, relish, sauces, cereal-based snack-foods and prepared dietary food and food-items to accommodate special health and dietary conditions; Food for diabetics or medically-restricted diets; Nutritional additives for use in food and dietary supplements for human consumptionACTIVE—
029Food beverages; oils and fats for food; organic food bars; powdered milk for food purposes; protein for use as a food additive; soy protein for use as a food additiveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 5, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 4, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance