USPTO serial 77018546
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bellingham, WA
Bellingham, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul L. Havel
PAUL L HAVEL MILLER NASH LLP601 UNION ST STE 4400SEATTLE, WA 98101-2352UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters in the field of accounting, tax, and consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Accounting services; tax services; assurance services; consulting services relating to benchmarking, business owner succession, strategic planning, information technology, personal wealth, estate planning, financial planning, royalty compliance, valuation, mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, research, risk management, claims resolution, litigation, healthcare, asset management benefit plan audit, business planning, and human capital | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Investment advisory services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Conducting seminars in the fields of accounting, tax, and consulting services; providing newsletters in the fields of accounting, tax, and consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |