USPTO serial 77018702
COLORPLUS COLLISION CENTRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3641662Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COLORPLUS COLLISION CENTRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOUCHERVILLE, CA
BOUCHERVILLE, CA
BOUCHERVILLE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
BRENT E ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Auto body repair and painting for motor vehicles; auto body repair for motor vehicles; auto body painting for motor vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |