USPTO serial 77018703
SIDEKICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIDEKICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William W. Haefliger
William W. Haefliger Law Offices of WW Haefliger201 S. Lake AvenueSuite 512Pasadena, CA 91101-3087Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | industrial use battery charging equipment, namely charging controls, battery cooling fans, and battery mounted steel enclosures therefore, only for use in charging forklifts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |