Drawing for BLANK SHIRTS

USPTO serial 77018735

BLANK SHIRTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLANK SHIRTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew Francis

MATTHEW FRANCIS WATSON ROUNDS5371 KIETZKE LNRENO, NV 89511UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail and wholesale store services, featuring clothingACTIVESep 10, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 16, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 14, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 19, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance