USPTO serial 77019041
LA PRINCESA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA PRINCESA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
Timothy D. Pecsenye BLANK ROME LLP9TH FLOORONE LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | BATHING SUITS; BLOUSES; BONNETS; BOOTIE SETS; CAPS; COATS; COVERALLS; DANCE OUTFITS, NAMELY, LEOTARDS, TIGHTS, FOOTLESS TIGHTS, BODY SUITS, LEG WARMERS, LEGGINGS, TAP PANTS, UNITARDS, AND KNIT HOSIERY; CLOTH DIAPERS; SLIPPERS; FLEECE SETS, NAMELY, PULLOVERS, PANTS, SHIRTS, AND JACKETS; HATS; HEAD BANDS; HOSIERY; JACKETS; JOGGING SUITS; LAYETTE SETS; LEOTARDS; MITTENS; NIGHTGOWNS; ONE PIECE SETS, NAMELY, COVERALLS, JUMPERS, JUMPSUITS, AND ROMPERS; OVERALLS; PAJAMAS; PANTS; PANTIES; PETTICOATS; ROBES; SANDALS; SKIRTS; SHOES; SHORTS; SLIPS; SNEAKERS; SOCKS; SWEATERS; SWIM WEAR COVER-UPS; T-SHIRTS; TIGHTS; UNDERSHIRTS; UNDERSKIRTS; UNDERPANTS; UNDERWEAR; WIND RESISTANT JACKETS; GLOVES; AND VISORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |