USPTO serial 77019083
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rancho Dominguez, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
JILL M PIETRINI MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP11355 OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, shorts, socks, underwear, pants, sweatshirts, sweatpants, bandannas, jackets, Jean jackets, tank tops, vests, hockey jerseys, soccer jerseys, fashion knit shirts, button-down shirts, basketball jerseys, long sleeve t-shirts, sweaters, baseball jerseys, polo shirts, muscle t-shirts, mock turtle necks, track pants, ponchos, and hooded shirts; headwear; and footwear, all for sale to prison commissaries or for sale to or for prison inmates | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 14, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |