USPTO serial 77019681
FREEFORM RX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FREEFORM RX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan B. Meyer
SUSAN B. MEYER GORDON & REES LLP101 W BROADWAYSUITE 1600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-8217Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyeglass lenses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |