USPTO serial 77019839
HELIUM REPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELIUM REPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace Han Stanton
GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines, articles, reviews, news and guide books featuring lifestyles, boats and boating, yachts and yachting, airplanes and airplane travel, resorts, real estate, private residence club services, and rental, purchase, or fractional purchase of all of the foregoing, automobiles and other motorized vehicles, athletic and exercise equipment, electronic equipment, electronic gadgets, cameras, clothing, accessories, jewelry, luggage, sports, recreational, electronic goods, consumer products, consumer services, and financial information, of interest to wealthy consumers | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing real estate listings, real estate time share listings, and real estate information via the Internet; cruise ship, boat and marine property services, namely listings of residential and commercial units aboard cruise ships, boats and marine properties; listings of and referrals for time share interests in aircrafts and private jets, for wealthy consumers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online non-downloadable publications in the nature of magazines, articles, reviews, news and guide books featuring lifestyles, boats and boating, yachts and yachting, airplanes and airplane travel, resorts, real estate, private residence club services, and rental, purchase, or fractional purchase of all of the foregoing, automobiles and other motorized vehicles, athletic equipment, electronic equipment, electronic gadgets, exercise equipment, cameras, clothing, accessories, jewelry, luggage, sports, recreational, electronic goods, consumer products, consumer services, financial information, of interest to wealthy consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |