CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AIRFIRE

USPTO serial 77019993

AIRFIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRFIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael P. Sandonato, Joanna L. Garelick

Pasquale A. Razzano Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto1290 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrical power generatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 1, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 31, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 31, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance