USPTO serial 77020368
OLA BELL'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLA BELL'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo J. Bufalino
Angelo J. Bufalino Vedder Price P.C.222 North LaSalle Street - 24th FloorChicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Croutons, stuffing consisting of bread; shred which is a form of bread stuffing; dried bread; bread batters; spices, namely, spice blends for croutons and stuffing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |